Manifold barometric/pressure compensation

Give input on tuning as well as any tips and tricks you may have. Also feel free to share base mapping files for various engine types.
stevieturbo
Posts: 3577
Joined: Tue Aug 02, 2011 12:08 pm
ECU Model: No ECU
Location: Norn Iron

Re: Manifold barometric/pressure compensation

Post by stevieturbo »

Some people do the strangest things...some knowingly, many unknowingly.

I seen a map from a Link ecu a few years ago done by a local tuner that looked like the grand canyon. It seems they had 4D tables implemented so whilst main table was MAP vs RPM, in the background there was also a TPS vs RPM table active and TBH I don't think they were even aware of this, because the grand canyon with the main table seemed to be trying to compensate for what the TPS vs RPM table was doing.

The vehicle did drive, but overall it was a mess.

When using MAP vs RPM as main load, it makes no sense at all to also run MAP compensations.
rocar
Posts: 107
Joined: Sat Sep 10, 2011 8:20 am

Re: Manifold barometric/pressure compensation

Post by rocar »

You can map vs load and manifold compensations, very easier for mapping
Set map up to 100 kpa and use compensation table for boost
rocar
Posts: 107
Joined: Sat Sep 10, 2011 8:20 am

Re: Manifold barometric/pressure compensation

Post by rocar »

Image[/url][/img]
Rob Stevens
Posts: 1247
Joined: Thu Jul 28, 2011 4:10 am
ECU Model: S100 Pro
Distributor: None-Coil On Plug :)

Re: Manifold barometric/pressure compensation

Post by Rob Stevens »

That's interesting, but why would you be increasing ignition advance with boost, just seems counter intuitive. But I guess if that's what the engine likes
rocar
Posts: 107
Joined: Sat Sep 10, 2011 8:20 am

Re: Manifold barometric/pressure compensation

Post by rocar »

Rob Stevens wrote:That's interesting, but why would you be increasing ignition advance with boost, just seems counter intuitive. But I guess if that's what the engine likes
Yes they should be negative, that;s just an example ;)
Post Reply